Q-Bewegung sagt mir gar nichts und der Mord an Kennedy ist ja inzwischen auch schon ne Weile her.
Q-Bewegung ist QAnon siehe hier:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon
Ein echt detailreicher Artikel. Danach hat QAnon alles dafür getan als irre Verschwörungstheoretiker zu erscheinen und keine Gelegenheit ausgelassen, sich in der Öffentlichkeit lächerlich zu machen.
Das schließt allerdings nicht aus, dass das 4 Jahre lang alles nur Täuschung war und die Hintermänner damit alle glauben lassen wollten, das die harmlos sind. Das wäre natürlich ein genialer Plan. - Wenn es denn so wäre.
According to analysis by Media Matters, as of August 20, 2020, Trump had amplified QAnon messaging at least 216 times by retweeting or mentioning 129 QAnon-affiliated Twitter accounts, sometimes multiple times a day.[39][40] On September 9, 2019, Trump retweeted a video from the QAnon-promoting Twitter account "The Dirty Truth". The video featured future director of national intelligence John Ratcliffe criticizing former FBI director James Comey.[196] On August 24, 2018, Trump hosted William "Lionel" Lebron, a leading QAnon promoter, in the Oval Office for a photo op.[197][198][199] Shortly after Christmas 2019, Trump retweeted over a dozen QAnon followers.[200]
On August 19, 2020, Trump was asked about QAnon during a press conference; he replied: "I don't know much about the movement, other than I understand they like me very much, which I appreciate. But I don't know much about the movement."[201][202] An FBI Field Office in Phoenix has called QAnon a potential domestic terror threat, but Trump called QAnon adherents "people who love our country".[203][204] When a reporter asked Trump if he could support a notion that suggests he "is secretly saving the world from this satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals," he responded: "Well, I haven't heard that, but is that supposed to be a bad thing or a good thing?" Presidential candidate Joe Biden responded that Trump was aiming to "legitimize a conspiracy theory that the FBI has identified as a domestic terrorism threat".[9][205]
On October 15, 2020, when given the opportunity to denounce QAnon at a "town hall"-style campaign event, Trump refused to do so and instead pointed out that QAnon opposes pedophilia.[206] He said he knew nothing else about QAnon and told his questioner, Savannah Guthrie of NBC News, that no one can know whether the premise of QAnon's conspiracy theory is true. "They believe it is a satanic cult run by the deep state," Guthrie informed him. "No, I don't know that. And neither do you know that," Trump responded.[207]
Sperrungen im Web:
On May 5, 2020, Facebook announced its removal of 5 pages, 20 accounts, and 6 groups linked to "individuals associated with the QAnon network"
Facebook reported having already "removed over 790 groups, 100 Pages and 1,500 ads tied to QAnon from Facebook, blocked over 300 hashtags across Facebook and Instagram, and additionally imposed restrictions on over 1,950 Groups and 440 Pages on Facebook and over 10,000 accounts on Instagram."[16][247][248][249] In the first month after its August announcement, Facebook said it deleted 1,500 QAnon groups; such groups by then had 4 million followers. On October 6, 2020, Facebook said it would immediately begin removing "any Facebook Pages, Groups and Instagram accounts representing QAnon, even if they contain no violent content." The company said it would immediately ban any group representing QAnon.
On July 21, 2020, Twitter announced it was banning over 7,000 accounts in connection with QAnon
It also said that the actions may apply to over 150,000 accounts.
Trump hat sich zu QAnon genaus nichtssagend geäussert wie hierzu:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_federal_government_data_breach
President Donald Trump made no comment on the hack for days after it was reported, leading Senator Mitt Romney to decry his "silence and inaction".[184] On December 19, Trump publicly addressed the attacks for the first time; he downplayed the hack, contended that the media had overblown the severity of the incident, said that "everything is well under control"; and proposed, without evidence, that China, rather than Russia, might be responsible for the attack. Trump then pivoted to insisting that he had won the 2020 presidential election.[114][113][111][185][186] He speculated, without evidence, that the attack might also have involved a "hit" on voting machines, part of a long-running campaign by Trump to falsely assert that he won the 2020 election. Trump's claim was rebutted by former CISA director Chris Krebs, who pointed out that Trump's claim was not possible.[1][186][187] Adam Schiff, chair of the House Intelligence Committee, described Trump's statements as dishonest,[188] calling the comment a "scandalous betrayal of our national security" that "sounds like it could have been written in the Kremlin."[186]
Former Homeland Security Advisor Thomas P. Bossert said, "President Trump is on the verge of leaving behind a federal government, and perhaps a large number of major industries, compromised by the Russian government," and noted that congressional action, including via the National Defense Authorization Act would be required to mitigate the damage caused by the attacks.[29][189][46] Russell Brandom, policy editor for The Verge, called the U.S. ill-prepared for the hack, and criticized Trump for having consistently "treated the federal cybersecurity effort as one more partisan battleground, with attacks and vulnerabilities embraced or rejected largely on the basis of their value as a political cudgel"; Brandom wrote that "this is no way to run the world’s most powerful intelligence apparatus."[53] Fred Kaplan, writing in Slate, criticized Trump for promoting fake claims of election fraud while "ignoring a real cybersecurity crisis," writing: "For all of Trump's wailing about fictitious hacks that stole the election, he has been otherwise notably uncurious about the nation's cybersecurity."[51] Esquire commentator Charles P. Pierce criticized the Trump administration for being "asleep at the switch" and termed Trump a "crooked, incompetent agent of chaos."[190]
Wenn man sieht, dass Trump vor dem Hack die gefeuert hat, die Ihn verhindern sollten:
The federal data breach occurred over the course of at least 8 or 9 months during the final year of the presidency of Donald Trump.[10][11] Throughout this time, the White House lacked a cybersecurity coordinator, Trump having eliminated the post itself in 2018.[51][52] When the breach was discovered, the U.S. also lacked a Senate-confirmed Director of CISA, the nation's top cybersecurity official, responsible for coordinating incident response.[53][39][40] The incumbent, Chris Krebs, had been fired by Trump on November 18, 2020.[54][55][56] Also at that time, the DHS, which manages CISA, lacked a Senate-confirmed Secretary, Deputy Secretary, General Counsel, Undersecretary for Intelligence and Analysis, and Undersecretary for Management; and Trump had recently forced out the Deputy Director of CISA.
und seine Äusserung, dass alles unter Kontrolle ist, kann man schon auf dumme Gedanken kommen.
Es wurden Teile des Pentagon gehackt, das Finanz- und Gesundheitsministerium, jede Menge weitere Ministerien, Firmen u.a. AstraZeneca, das europäische Parlament, die NATO uvm. Auch die Bundesregierung war betroffen, Verteidigungsministerium, Gesundheitsministerium, das RKI...
Da hat jetzt jemand soviele Daten, dass es für mindestens 100x so viele Veröffentlichungen reichen würde, wie bei Wikileaks und hier wären die Daten auch noch aktuell.
Durch Corona mussten Geschäftleute auf Reisen verzichten und Videokonferenzen waren angesagt. Die Provider dieser Konferenzen wurden ebenfalls gehackt, also haben die auch alle Daten der Videokonferenzen der letzten Monate.
Sie nutzten dazu u.a. die Hintertüren, die um uns ausspionieren zu können in jeder Software drin sein musste und wo uns Snowden vor gewarnt hat, der dann ins Asyl nach Russland musste.
Jetzt ist die Frage, wer hinter den Hacks steckt. Ist es Trump, der uns 4 Jahre lang vorgespielt hat, bekloppt zu sein und hinter den Kulissen lange vorgeplant hat, oder ist es eine ausländische Macht, die mit dem jetzigen Wissen alles vor einem Großangriff lahmlegen kann?